AERS Will Have Ratings in 2012

We will have ratings next year, and this time I will go through with it.

The thing I have with ratings is that I want it to be realistically correct yet still give everyone a chance, and I'm not sure how I can execute that. I don't want drastic changes in the ratings (Like 60-80 for one and 30-90 for another for example) because the racing will just be bad.

I will get the package up nearing the end of the season, but even then don't send in ratings until I inform you can do so.

Piece of cake. You can get your point across to everyone as to how you are going to do this better than me. I tried to get my point across as to how I was going to do ratings for my league, and nobody understood.

My idea

1 90-100
2 90-90's
1 80-90

Blake Camphausen wrote:

My idea

1 90-100
2 90-90's
1 80-90

I think this would work, seeing as the ratings now are 90-100.

The best way to give everyone a shot, but still keep it predictable, is to have overlap.

IE:
85-100
80-95
75-90

or how bout something simple:

Have all except 1 be 85-90, the 1 could be 90-95, so instead of thinking doing it for all sections, do it for like 2, and 3.

simple? better than Moppy's or Blakes

ABOUT. FRIGGIN. TIME.

I like Moppy's idea, but with a few tweaks.

1 90-100
2 85-95
1 75-85

I think it should be like.

xx/x-100 for each if them.

Better example.

Herb Cilantro 93-100
Mike Oppenheimer 86-100
Eric Webler 71-100
Will Legge 81-100
Tyson Lautenschlager 90-100
Daniel Leckliter 83-100
Fred Ritcher 94-100
Jalen Scranson 88-100
Patrick Eichholtz 89-100

Every driver in that race has potential to do there best. Some drivers have a better chance then others. You'll always see Herb and Fred and Tyson and Patrick running up front but once in a while youll have Eric Webler having a good race and/or Will Legge up there.

Eric J Floppyfish wrote:

I think it should be like.

xx/x-100 for each if them.

Better example.

Herb Cilantro 93-100
Mike Oppenheimer 86-100
Eric Webler 71-100
Will Legge 81-100
Nick Kozoro 84-100
Tyson Lautenschlager 90-100
Daniel Leckliter 83-100
Fred Ritcher 94-100
Jalen Scranson 88-100
Patrick Eichholtz 89-100

Every driver in that race has potential to do there best. Some drivers have a better chance then others. You'll always see Herb and Fred and Tyson and Patrick running up front but once in a while youll have Eric Webler having a good race and/or Will Legge up there.

Prawblem. We can't exactly make that into a user-submitted process, unless you want to see everyone send in 100 FOAR EVRYTHING LAWL LAWL LAWL

AAROdynamic426 wrote:

Eric J Floppyfish wrote:

I think it should be like.

xx/x-100 for each if them.

Better example.

Herb Cilantro 93-100
Mike Oppenheimer 86-100
Eric Webler 71-100
Will Legge 81-100
Nick Kozoro 84-100
Tyson Lautenschlager 90-100
Daniel Leckliter 83-100
Fred Ritcher 94-100
Jalen Scranson 88-100
Patrick Eichholtz 89-100

Every driver in that race has potential to do there best. Some drivers have a better chance then others. You'll always see Herb and Fred and Tyson and Patrick running up front but once in a while youll have Eric Webler having a good race and/or Will Legge up there.

Prawblem. We can't exactly make that into a user-submitted process, unless you want to see everyone send in 100 FOAR EVRYTHING LAWL LAWL LAWL

Make a limit like the rating can't be higher than 95 or something.

Michael29shell wrote:

Make a limit like the rating can't be higher than 95 or something.

Okay...THEN guess what number everyone's going to send in???

*coughillgiveyouahintitslightningmcqueensnumbercough*

Or depending on recent success, me, Vinny and whoever else can/wants to help can do them on our own. I mean, wouldn't that be more realistic?

Or maybe ratings that change with each race depending on what the driver is excelling in?

AAROdynamic426 wrote:

Michael29shell wrote:

Make a limit like the rating can't be higher than 95 or something.

Okay...THEN guess what number everyone's going to send in???

*coughillgiveyouahintitslightningmcqueensnumbercough*

Then let the Nick or you chose the rating in a random draw.

Eric J Floppyfish wrote:

I think it should be like.

xx/x-100 for each if them.

Better example.

Herb Cilantro 3-100
Mike Oppenheimer 6-100
Eric Webler 7-100
Will Legge 1-100
Nick Kozoro 4-100
Tyson Lautenschlager 99-100
Daniel Leckliter 3-100
Fred Ritcher 9-100
Jalen Scranson 8-100
Patrick Eichholtz 9-100

Every driver in that race has potential to do there best. Some drivers have a better chance then others. You'll always see Tyson running up front but once in a while youll have Tyson winning like always.

Fixed for you Eric.

And I fixed ur quote tagz. -- Vinny

Pwnt -- Mopp